Tips for passing Part L2A

 

The following measures should be considered when attempting to achieve a pass for the Building CO₂ Emission Rate (Criterion 1). Many of them will also benefit summer temperatures (Criterion 3). They are listed in rough order of importance.

Substantial reductions in building emission rate can be achieved by improving HVAC efficiency. The UK NCM System Data Wizard provides options for changing a range of system settings and parameters. For systems that are not covered there, it is permissible to enter appropriate parameters in the Apache System dialogue, provided they can be justified on the basis of manufacturers’ data.

Fuel choice has a major effect on carbon emissions.

Specific fan power (SFP) is a parameter that has a significant effect on system performance.  The Non-Domestic Heating, Cooling and Ventilation Compliance Guide defines requirements for a number of features including SFP. These are potentially onerous requirements that need to be taken into account from the start of projects.  Designers need to be careful to allow large enough plant and riser space to ensure that these requirements can be met. Note that default values for SFP in the UK NCM System Data Wizard (which mirror those in iSBEM) tend to be somewhat high, often exceeding the Criterion 2 requirement. These therefore need to be edited.

The ‘System adjustment’ and ‘Control corrections’ options in the wizard produce worthwhile improvements in performance.

DHW systems should be examined for efficiency opportunities.

Efficient lighting and lighting controls offer substantial potential for bringing down emission rates and moderating summer temperatures. Any saving in lighting consumption has a double benefit, directly reducing electrical load and by reducing room gains having a favourable effect on summertime cooling loads and temperatures.

Reducing glazing area, introducing shading and optimising glazing type may all improve the building’s performance. The implications for natural lighting, should, however be borne in mind.

Since infiltration is reduced to low levels by Criterion 2, and minimum ventilation levels are laid down by the room activities, the main opportunity for using ventilation control to reduce carbon emissions and summer temperatures is free cooling.

Night-time ventilation (which should be implemented using natural ventilation air exchanges) can significantly reduce summer temperatures in naturally ventilated buildings.

It is possible to use both MacroFlo and ApacheHVAC in compliance simulations. However, the inputs to both these programs need to be set with care in order to ensure that the ventilation levels and schedules specified for the room activities are accurately reproduced. In both cases profiles will need to match that of the NCM usage schedules, which means that special models will need to be created for the compliance simulations.

The NCM templates for DHW usage have been found to be high for some activities, particularly changing areas in sports centres and schools. The DHW usage can be changed by altering the designation of activity areas, but this would need to be agreed in advance with Building Control.

The settings entered in this box on the Building & System Data ‘Building & System Performance’ tab produce useful reductions in the Building Emission Rate (BER).

Improving U-values will tend to reduce heating, but may increase cooling demand in air-conditioned buildings. Increasing the solar performance of the glass by reducing the solar gains into the building can reduce cooling requirement, but may also increase heating demand.

To assess which option (U-value or solar performance) will have the greatest effect, perform a test run on the actual building and look for the dominant load. Buildings with high internal gains and large areas of glazing will almost certainly be cooling dominated.

Increasing the thermal mass of the building, for example using exposed ceiling slabs, will tend to reduce cooling demand and moderate summer temperatures.

The air permeability of the building envelope has to conform to the standard set by Criterion 2, namely a permeability of 10 m³/hr/m² at 50 Pa (corresponding to an air leakage index of 15 m³/hr/m²⁾. Guidance in CIBSE TM23 indicates that this permeability typically gives rise to an air infiltration rate of about 0.25 ach. An improved permeability can be assumed to produce an improved infiltration rate in proportion.

Note that while reducing infiltration rates will tend to lower heating energy, it may increase cooling energy by reducing the building’s ability to dispose of internal heat gains.

This dialogue, on a tab at the lower edge of the <VE> Compliance screen, deals with general data required for Part L (2006) ApacheSim compliance analysis. It also provides the means to execute compliance simulations and other types of simulation. Results from the compliance simulations are displayed on the neighbouring Results tab.

The Analysis and Results tab will be visible provided no room is selected.

This frame handles the input of general data required for Part L (2006) ApacheSim compliance simulations.

The building type for the L2 (2006) compliance analysis, sometimes referred to as the NCM building type. The NCM methodology requires the building to be assigned a type such as ‘Airport terminal’, ‘Hospital’ or ‘Office’. For each building type there is a set of ‘activities’ that can be assigned to rooms in the building (optionally via templates) and which dictate the conditions assumed in those rooms. The building type also determines the building category, which is used to set the glazing percentages in the notional building.

For each building type a Building Category is automatically set. This determines glazing in the notional building.

This button displays the Building & System Data dialogue, which is also accessible via the Settings menu.

Three types of simulation can be performed on the actual building. In the case of the notional building only the second type of simulation (test run) is enabled.

This button triggers the Part L2 (2006) compliance analysis, which has four stages:

U-value checks

Simulation of the actual building using ApacheSim

Simulation of the notional building using ApacheSim

Invocation of the BRUKL compliance calculator

The U-value checks test for compliance with the fabric requirements of Criterion 2. A test failure halts the compliance analysis.

The simulations are performed over a year using the appropriate CIBSE Test Reference Year (TRY) weather dataset. Simulation settings for these simulations may be edited in a facility accessed via the Building & System Data dialogue. Simulation settings are shared between the three types of simulation (except where overridden by the demands of a particular type of simulation – for example the requirement for compliance simulations to cover the whole year).

The BRUKL compliance calculator uses the simulation results to calculate the TER and BER, which then determine whether compliance has been achieved. The results are incorporated in reports accessible via the Results tab.

This button pops up an ApacheSim dialog allowing test simulations to be carried out on the actual building under the conditions applied for compliance simulations. This provides a means of testing the performance of the actual building before committing to a compliance run.

This button pops up an ApacheSim dialog allowing simulations to be performed to assess the performance of the building under Criterion 3 (method b). At the end of the simulation a report on temperature statistics for non air-conditioned rooms is automatically generated. This type of simulation uses the Design Weather Year appropriate to the building location.

This frame provides shortcuts to tools for setting the following model data:

Site location and weather data (APlocate)

Constructions

Building Templates

Apache Systems